What are the chances of seeing a Lesser Swallow-tailed Swift in Marino Ballena National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Lesser Swallow-tailed Swift sighting in Marino Ballena National Park on a given day, based on 29 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 193rd most-seen of the 303 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Lesser Swallow-tailed Swift in Marino Ballena National Park?
September
In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Lesser Swallow-tailed Swift in Marino Ballena National Park on a given day, against under 5% in October to August, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Lesser Swallow-tailed Swift?
Between 6 and 9 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Lesser Swallow-tailed Swift sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Marino Ballena National Park the best place to see a Lesser Swallow-tailed Swift?
22nd of 35
Of the 35 parks where we can rate Lesser Swallow-tailed Swift sightings, Marino Ballena National Park ranks 22nd at under 5%. The best odds are in Bastimentos Island National Marine Park (Panama, about 20%), Tikal National Park (Guatemala, about 10%) and Soberanía National Park (Panama, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Lesser Swallow-tailed Swift live in Marino Ballena National Park?
Same family: Apodidae
The closest relatives of the Lesser Swallow-tailed Swift that you can see in Marino Ballena National Park (family Apodidae, Swifts) are White-collared Swift (about 10%) and Costa Rican Swift (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Lesser Swallow-tailed Swift sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Lesser Swallow-tailed Swift is recorded against all the birds logged in Marino Ballena National Park (29 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.