What are the chances of seeing a Hooded Warbler in Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Hooded Warbler sighting in Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge on a given day, based on 34 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 217th most-seen of the 279 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Hooded Warbler in Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Hooded Warbler in Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Hooded Warbler?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Hooded Warbler sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge the best place to see a Hooded Warbler?
31st of 41
Of the 41 parks where we can rate Hooded Warbler sightings, Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge ranks 31st at under 5%. The best odds are in Tikal National Park (Guatemala, about 40%), Sian Ka'an Biosphere Reserve (Mexico, about 30%) and Cockscomb Basin Wildlife Sanctuary (Belize, about 30%).
Which relatives of the Hooded Warbler live in Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge?
Same genus: Setophaga
The closest relatives of the Hooded Warbler that you can see in Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge (genus Setophaga, Setophaga Warblers) are Yellow-rumped Warbler (about 40%), Palm Warbler (about 40%) and Northern Parula (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Hooded Warbler sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Hooded Warbler is recorded against all the birds logged in Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge (34 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.