What are the chances of seeing a Yellow-bellied Sapsucker in Parque Natural Metropolitano?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Yellow-bellied Sapsucker sighting in Parque Natural Metropolitano on a given day, based on 35 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 249th most-seen of the 328 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Yellow-bellied Sapsucker in Parque Natural Metropolitano?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Yellow-bellied Sapsucker in Parque Natural Metropolitano on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Yellow-bellied Sapsucker?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Yellow-bellied Sapsucker sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Parque Natural Metropolitano the best place to see a Yellow-bellied Sapsucker?
35th of 44
Of the 44 parks where we can rate Yellow-bellied Sapsucker sightings, Parque Natural Metropolitano ranks 35th at under 5%. The best odds are in Riding Mountain National Park (Canada, about 40%), Congaree National Park (United States, about 30%) and Elk Island National Park (Canada, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Yellow-bellied Sapsucker live in Parque Natural Metropolitano?
Same family: Picidae
The closest relatives of the Yellow-bellied Sapsucker that you can see in Parque Natural Metropolitano (family Picidae, Woodpeckers) are Red-crowned Woodpecker (about 60%) and Crimson-crested Woodpecker (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Yellow-bellied Sapsucker sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Yellow-bellied Sapsucker is recorded against all the birds logged in Parque Natural Metropolitano (35 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.