What are the chances of seeing a Lineated Woodpecker in Parque Natural Metropolitano?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Lineated Woodpecker sighting in Parque Natural Metropolitano on a given day, based on 207 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 114th most-seen of the 328 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Lineated Woodpecker in Parque Natural Metropolitano?
April–May and November–January
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Lineated Woodpecker in Parque Natural Metropolitano on a given day, against under 5% in February–March and June–October, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Lineated Woodpecker?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Lineated Woodpecker sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Parque Natural Metropolitano the best place to see a Lineated Woodpecker?
50th of 68
Of the 68 parks where we can rate Lineated Woodpecker sightings, Parque Natural Metropolitano ranks 50th at under 5%. The best odds are in Tikal National Park (Guatemala, about 40%), Calakmul Biosphere Reserve (Mexico, about 30%) and Amboró National Park (Bolivia, about 30%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Lineated Woodpecker live in Parque Natural Metropolitano?
Same family: Picidae
The closest relatives of the Lineated Woodpecker that you can see in Parque Natural Metropolitano (family Picidae, Woodpeckers) are Red-crowned Woodpecker (about 60%) and Crimson-crested Woodpecker (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Lineated Woodpecker sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Lineated Woodpecker is recorded against all the birds logged in Parque Natural Metropolitano (207 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.