What are the chances of seeing a Stork-billed Kingfisher in Mudumalai National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Stork-billed Kingfisher sighting in Mudumalai National Park on a given day, based on 27 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 175th most-seen of the 233 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Stork-billed Kingfisher in Mudumalai National Park?
February and April–June
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Stork-billed Kingfisher in Mudumalai National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March and July–January, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Stork-billed Kingfisher?
Between 2 and 5 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Stork-billed Kingfisher sightings with a recorded time, and about half of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Mudumalai National Park the best place to see a Stork-billed Kingfisher?
27th of 33
Of the 33 parks where we can rate Stork-billed Kingfisher sightings, Mudumalai National Park ranks 27th at under 5%. The best odds are in Tanjung Puting National Park (Indonesia, about 80%), Kinabatangan Wildlife Sanctuary (Malaysia, about 70%) and Royal Bardia National Park (Nepal, about 40%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Stork-billed Kingfisher live in Mudumalai National Park?
Same family: Alcedinidae
The closest relatives of the Stork-billed Kingfisher that you can see in Mudumalai National Park (family Alcedinidae, Kingfishers) are White-throated Kingfisher (about 50%) and Common Kingfisher (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Stork-billed Kingfisher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Stork-billed Kingfisher is recorded against all the birds logged in Mudumalai National Park (27 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.