What are the chances of seeing a Yellow Tyrannulet in Sierra de la Macarena National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Yellow Tyrannulet sighting in Sierra de la Macarena National Park on a given day, based on 10 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 352nd most-seen of the 418 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Yellow Tyrannulet in Sierra de la Macarena National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Yellow Tyrannulet in Sierra de la Macarena National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Yellow Tyrannulet?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Yellow Tyrannulet sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Sierra de la Macarena National Park the best place to see a Yellow Tyrannulet?
18th of 29
Of the 29 parks where we can rate Yellow Tyrannulet sightings, Sierra de la Macarena National Park ranks 18th at under 5%. The best odds are in Iguazú National Park (Argentina, about 20%), Iguaçu National Park (Brazil, about 20%) and San Lorenzo Protected Forest (Panama, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Yellow Tyrannulet live in Sierra de la Macarena National Park?
Same family: Tyrannidae
The closest relatives of the Yellow Tyrannulet that you can see in Sierra de la Macarena National Park (family Tyrannidae, Tyrant Flycatchers) are Tropical Kingbird (about 60%), Great Kiskadee (about 30%) and Rusty-margined Flycatcher (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Yellow Tyrannulet sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Yellow Tyrannulet is recorded against all the birds logged in Sierra de la Macarena National Park (10 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.