What are the chances of seeing a White-throated Kingfisher in Yala National Park?
Very likely
About 70% of wildlife watchers report a White-throated Kingfisher sighting in Yala National Park on a given day, based on 737 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 8th most-seen of the 220 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a White-throated Kingfisher in Yala National Park?
February, June, September and December
In those months about 80% of wildlife watchers report a White-throated Kingfisher in Yala National Park on a given day, against about 70% in January, March–May, July–August and October–November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a White-throated Kingfisher?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most White-throated Kingfisher sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Yala National Park the best place to see a White-throated Kingfisher?
6th of 37
Of the 37 parks where we can rate White-throated Kingfisher sightings, Yala National Park ranks 6th at about 70%. The best odds are in Keoladeo National Park (India, about 80%), Wilpattu National Park (Sri Lanka, about 80%) and Chitwan National Park (Nepal, about 80%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the White-throated Kingfisher live in Yala National Park?
Same family: Alcedinidae
The closest relatives of the White-throated Kingfisher that you can see in Yala National Park (family Alcedinidae, Kingfishers) are Common Kingfisher (about 50%), Pied Kingfisher (about 30%) and Stork-billed Kingfisher (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the White-throated Kingfisher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the White-throated Kingfisher is recorded against all the birds logged in Yala National Park (737 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.