What are the chances of seeing a Pied Kingfisher in Bandipur National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Pied Kingfisher sighting in Bandipur National Park on a given day, based on 18 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 195th most-seen of the 256 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Pied Kingfisher in Bandipur National Park?
January
In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Pied Kingfisher in Bandipur National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February to December, the lowest months. That is one of Bandipur National Park's driest months, with about 15 mm of rain against 210 mm in July.
What time of day is best to see a Pied Kingfisher?
Between 3 and 6 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Pied Kingfisher sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Bandipur National Park the best place to see a Pied Kingfisher?
64th of 67
Of the 67 parks where we can rate Pied Kingfisher sightings, Bandipur National Park ranks 64th at under 5%. The best odds are in Liwonde National Park (Malawi, about 70%), Niokolo-Koba National Park (Senegal, about 70%) and Gonarezhou National Park (Zimbabwe, about 60%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Pied Kingfisher live in Bandipur National Park?
Same family: Alcedinidae
The closest relatives of the Pied Kingfisher that you can see in Bandipur National Park (family Alcedinidae, Kingfishers) are White-throated Kingfisher (about 50%) and Common Kingfisher (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Pied Kingfisher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Pied Kingfisher is recorded against all the birds logged in Bandipur National Park (18 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.