What are the chances of seeing a Pied Kingfisher in Chitwan National Park?
Likely
About 50% of wildlife watchers report a Pied Kingfisher sighting in Chitwan National Park on a given day, based on 793 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 23rd most-seen of the 367 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 90%, and over a week to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Pied Kingfisher in Chitwan National Park?
January
In that month about 60% of wildlife watchers report a Pied Kingfisher in Chitwan National Park on a given day, against about 30% in July and August, the lowest months. That is one of Chitwan National Park's driest months, with about 20 mm of rain against 660 mm in July.
What time of day is best to see a Pied Kingfisher?
Between 3 and 6 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Pied Kingfisher sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Chitwan National Park the best place to see a Pied Kingfisher?
14th of 67
Of the 67 parks where we can rate Pied Kingfisher sightings, Chitwan National Park ranks 14th at about 50%. The best odds are in Liwonde National Park (Malawi, about 70%), Niokolo-Koba National Park (Senegal, about 70%) and Gonarezhou National Park (Zimbabwe, about 60%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Pied Kingfisher live in Chitwan National Park?
Same family: Alcedinidae
The closest relatives of the Pied Kingfisher that you can see in Chitwan National Park (family Alcedinidae, Kingfishers) are White-throated Kingfisher (about 80%), Common Kingfisher (about 50%) and Stork-billed Kingfisher (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Pied Kingfisher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Pied Kingfisher is recorded against all the birds logged in Chitwan National Park (793 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.