What are the chances of seeing a Pied Kingfisher in Gir National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Pied Kingfisher sighting in Gir National Park on a given day, based on 26 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 67th most-seen of the 135 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Pied Kingfisher in Gir National Park?
March
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Pied Kingfisher in Gir National Park on a given day, against under 5% in May, the lowest month. That is one of Gir National Park's driest months, with almost no rain against 330 mm in July. July and August have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Pied Kingfisher?
Between 3 and 6 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Pied Kingfisher sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Gir National Park the best place to see a Pied Kingfisher?
38th of 67
Of the 67 parks where we can rate Pied Kingfisher sightings, Gir National Park ranks 38th at about 10%. The best odds are in Liwonde National Park (Malawi, about 70%), Niokolo-Koba National Park (Senegal, about 70%) and Gonarezhou National Park (Zimbabwe, about 60%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Pied Kingfisher live in Gir National Park?
Same family: Alcedinidae
The closest relatives of the Pied Kingfisher that you can see in Gir National Park (family Alcedinidae, Kingfishers) are White-throated Kingfisher (about 60%) and Common Kingfisher (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Pied Kingfisher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Pied Kingfisher is recorded against all the birds logged in Gir National Park (26 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.