What are the chances of seeing a Northern Parula in Grand Canyon National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Northern Parula sighting in Grand Canyon National Park on a given day, based on 12 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 164th most-seen of the 194 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Northern Parula in Grand Canyon National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Northern Parula in Grand Canyon National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Northern Parula?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Northern Parula sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Grand Canyon National Park the best place to see a Northern Parula?
34th of 39
Of the 39 parks where we can rate Northern Parula sightings, Grand Canyon National Park ranks 34th at under 5%. The best odds are in Blue and John Crow Mountains National Park (Jamaica, about 60%), Ciénaga de Zapata (Cuba, about 50%) and Congaree National Park (United States, about 50%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Northern Parula live in Grand Canyon National Park?
Same genus: Setophaga
The closest relatives of the Northern Parula that you can see in Grand Canyon National Park (genus Setophaga, Setophaga Warblers) are Black-throated Gray Warbler (about 30%), Yellow-rumped Warbler (about 30%) and Northern Yellow Warbler (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Northern Parula sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Northern Parula is recorded against all the birds logged in Grand Canyon National Park (12 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.