What are the chances of seeing a Common Iora in Jim Corbett National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Common Iora sighting in Jim Corbett National Park on a given day, based on 352 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 95th most-seen of the 368 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Common Iora in Jim Corbett National Park?
February
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Common Iora in Jim Corbett National Park on a given day, against under 5% in July to September, the lowest months. That is one of Jim Corbett National Park's driest months, with about 30 mm of rain against 360 mm in July.
What time of day is best to see a Common Iora?
Between 2 and 5 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Common Iora sightings with a recorded time, and about half of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Jim Corbett National Park the best place to see a Common Iora?
29th of 40
Of the 40 parks where we can rate Common Iora sightings, Jim Corbett National Park ranks 29th at about 10%. The best odds are in Bali Barat National Park (Indonesia, about 70%), Bako National Park (Malaysia, about 70%) and Yala National Park (Sri Lanka, about 50%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Common Iora live in Jim Corbett National Park?
Same order: Passeriformes
The closest relatives of the Common Iora that you can see in Jim Corbett National Park (order Passeriformes, Perching Birds) are White-cheeked Bulbul (about 60%), Jungle Babbler (about 60%) and Red-whiskered Bulbul (about 60%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Common Iora sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Common Iora is recorded against all the birds logged in Jim Corbett National Park (352 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.