What are the chances of seeing a Pied Kingfisher in Namdapha National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Pied Kingfisher sighting in Namdapha National Park on a given day, based on 118 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 124th most-seen of the 298 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Pied Kingfisher in Namdapha National Park?
May and October–March
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Pied Kingfisher in Namdapha National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April, the lowest month. June to September have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Pied Kingfisher?
Between 3 and 6 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Pied Kingfisher sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Namdapha National Park the best place to see a Pied Kingfisher?
45th of 67
Of the 67 parks where we can rate Pied Kingfisher sightings, Namdapha National Park ranks 45th at about 10%. The best odds are in Liwonde National Park (Malawi, about 70%), Niokolo-Koba National Park (Senegal, about 70%) and Gonarezhou National Park (Zimbabwe, about 60%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Pied Kingfisher live in Namdapha National Park?
Same family: Alcedinidae
The closest relatives of the Pied Kingfisher that you can see in Namdapha National Park (family Alcedinidae, Kingfishers) are Crested Kingfisher (about 10%), Common Kingfisher (about 10%) and Blyth's Kingfisher (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Pied Kingfisher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Pied Kingfisher is recorded against all the birds logged in Namdapha National Park (118 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.