What are the chances of seeing a Least Flycatcher in Pico Bonito National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Least Flycatcher sighting in Pico Bonito National Park on a given day, based on 34 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 169th most-seen of the 271 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Least Flycatcher in Pico Bonito National Park?
February–March and October
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Least Flycatcher in Pico Bonito National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April–September and November–January, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Least Flycatcher?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Least Flycatcher sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Pico Bonito National Park the best place to see a Least Flycatcher?
25th of 50
Of the 50 parks where we can rate Least Flycatcher sightings, Pico Bonito National Park ranks 25th at under 5%. The best odds are in Elk Island National Park (Canada, about 50%), Point Pelee National Park (Canada, about 40%) and Calakmul Biosphere Reserve (Mexico, about 30%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Least Flycatcher live in Pico Bonito National Park?
Same genus: Empidonax
The closest relatives of the Least Flycatcher that you can see in Pico Bonito National Park (genus Empidonax, Empidonax Flycatchers) are Yellow-bellied Flycatcher (about 30%) and Acadian Flycatcher (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Least Flycatcher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Least Flycatcher is recorded against all the birds logged in Pico Bonito National Park (34 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.