What are the chances of seeing a Least Flycatcher in Ría Lagartos Biosphere Reserve?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Least Flycatcher sighting in Ría Lagartos Biosphere Reserve on a given day, based on 22 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 151st most-seen of the 216 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Least Flycatcher in Ría Lagartos Biosphere Reserve?
January
In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Least Flycatcher in Ría Lagartos Biosphere Reserve on a given day, against under 5% in February to December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Least Flycatcher?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Least Flycatcher sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Ría Lagartos Biosphere Reserve the best place to see a Least Flycatcher?
30th of 50
Of the 50 parks where we can rate Least Flycatcher sightings, Ría Lagartos Biosphere Reserve ranks 30th at under 5%. The best odds are in Elk Island National Park (Canada, about 50%), Point Pelee National Park (Canada, about 40%) and Calakmul Biosphere Reserve (Mexico, about 30%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Least Flycatcher live in Ría Lagartos Biosphere Reserve?
Same family: Tyrannidae
The closest relatives of the Least Flycatcher that you can see in Ría Lagartos Biosphere Reserve (family Tyrannidae, Tyrant Flycatchers) are Tropical Kingbird (about 40%), Great Kiskadee (about 20%) and Social Flycatcher (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Least Flycatcher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Least Flycatcher is recorded against all the birds logged in Ría Lagartos Biosphere Reserve (22 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.