What are the chances of seeing a Pied Kingfisher in South Luangwa National Park?
Likely
About 50% of wildlife watchers report a Pied Kingfisher sighting in South Luangwa National Park on a given day, based on 357 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 24th most-seen of the 257 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 90%, and over a week to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Pied Kingfisher in South Luangwa National Park?
March, May, August and December
In those months about 60% of wildlife watchers report a Pied Kingfisher in South Luangwa National Park on a given day, against about 40% in January–February, April, July and October–November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Pied Kingfisher?
Between 3 and 6 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Pied Kingfisher sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is South Luangwa National Park the best place to see a Pied Kingfisher?
10th of 67
Of the 67 parks where we can rate Pied Kingfisher sightings, South Luangwa National Park ranks 10th at about 50%. The best odds are in Liwonde National Park (Malawi, about 70%), Niokolo-Koba National Park (Senegal, about 70%) and Gonarezhou National Park (Zimbabwe, about 60%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Pied Kingfisher live in South Luangwa National Park?
Same family: Alcedinidae
The closest relatives of the Pied Kingfisher that you can see in South Luangwa National Park (family Alcedinidae, Kingfishers) are Brown-hooded Kingfisher (about 50%), Giant Kingfisher (about 20%) and Malachite Kingfisher (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Pied Kingfisher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Pied Kingfisher is recorded against all the birds logged in South Luangwa National Park (357 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.