What are the chances of seeing a Red-crowned Ant-Tanager in Tijuca National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Red-crowned Ant-Tanager sighting in Tijuca National Park on a given day, based on 167 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 85th most-seen of the 214 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Red-crowned Ant-Tanager in Tijuca National Park?
June–July, September and November–January
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Red-crowned Ant-Tanager in Tijuca National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February–May, August and October, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Red-crowned Ant-Tanager?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Red-crowned Ant-Tanager sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Tijuca National Park the best place to see a Red-crowned Ant-Tanager?
14th of 32
Of the 32 parks where we can rate Red-crowned Ant-Tanager sightings, Tijuca National Park ranks 14th at about 10%. The best odds are in Iguaçu National Park (Brazil, about 30%), Serra dos Órgãos National Park (Brazil, about 20%) and Iguazú National Park (Argentina, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Red-crowned Ant-Tanager live in Tijuca National Park?
Same order: Passeriformes
The closest relatives of the Red-crowned Ant-Tanager that you can see in Tijuca National Park (order Passeriformes, Perching Birds) are Great Kiskadee (about 90%), Palm Tanager (about 80%) and Bananaquit (about 80%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Red-crowned Ant-Tanager sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Red-crowned Ant-Tanager is recorded against all the birds logged in Tijuca National Park (167 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.