What are the chances of seeing a Sepia-capped Flycatcher in Yasuní National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Sepia-capped Flycatcher sighting in Yasuní National Park on a given day, based on 11 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 498th most-seen of the 533 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Sepia-capped Flycatcher in Yasuní National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Sepia-capped Flycatcher in Yasuní National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Sepia-capped Flycatcher?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Sepia-capped Flycatcher sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Yasuní National Park the best place to see a Sepia-capped Flycatcher?
28th of 30
Of the 30 parks where we can rate Sepia-capped Flycatcher sightings, Yasuní National Park ranks 28th at under 5%. The best odds are in Serra dos Órgãos National Park (Brazil, about 40%), Amboró National Park (Bolivia, about 30%) and Itatiaia National Park (Brazil, about 20%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Sepia-capped Flycatcher live in Yasuní National Park?
Same family: Tyrannidae
The closest relatives of the Sepia-capped Flycatcher that you can see in Yasuní National Park (family Tyrannidae, Tyrant Flycatchers) are Tropical Kingbird (about 50%), Great Kiskadee (about 50%) and Lesser Kiskadee (about 40%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Sepia-capped Flycatcher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Sepia-capped Flycatcher is recorded against all the birds logged in Yasuní National Park (11 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.