What are the chances of seeing a Crested Guan in Chirripó National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Crested Guan sighting in Chirripó National Park on a given day, based on 27 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 225th most-seen of the 332 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Crested Guan in Chirripó National Park?
May
In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Crested Guan in Chirripó National Park on a given day, against under 5% in June to April, the lowest months. That is one of Chirripó National Park's wettest months, with about 470 mm of rain against 75 mm in February.
What time of day is best to see a Crested Guan?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Crested Guan sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Chirripó National Park the best place to see a Crested Guan?
31st of 37
Of the 37 parks where we can rate Crested Guan sightings, Chirripó National Park ranks 31st at under 5%. The best odds are in Arenal Volcano National Park (Costa Rica, about 70%), Tenorio Volcano National Park (Costa Rica, about 50%) and Santa Rosa National Park (Costa Rica, about 40%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Crested Guan live in Chirripó National Park?
Same family: Cracidae
The closest relatives of the Crested Guan that you can see in Chirripó National Park (family Cracidae, Guans, Chachalacas, and Curassows) are Gray-headed Chachalaca (about 40%) and Black Guan (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Crested Guan sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Crested Guan is recorded against all the birds logged in Chirripó National Park (27 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.