What are the chances of seeing a Thick-billed Euphonia in Chirripó National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Thick-billed Euphonia sighting in Chirripó National Park on a given day, based on 206 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 76th most-seen of the 332 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Thick-billed Euphonia in Chirripó National Park?
January–March, June and November
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Thick-billed Euphonia in Chirripó National Park on a given day, against under 5% in September, the lowest month.
What time of day is best to see a Thick-billed Euphonia?
Between 6 and 9 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Thick-billed Euphonia sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Chirripó National Park the best place to see a Thick-billed Euphonia?
10th of 28
Of the 28 parks where we can rate Thick-billed Euphonia sightings, Chirripó National Park ranks 10th at about 10%. The best odds are in Chagres National Park (Panama, about 60%), Machalilla National Park (Ecuador, about 30%) and Tayrona National Natural Park (Colombia, about 30%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Thick-billed Euphonia live in Chirripó National Park?
Same genus: Euphonia
The closest relatives of the Thick-billed Euphonia that you can see in Chirripó National Park (genus Euphonia, Typical Euphonias) are Spot-crowned Euphonia (about 20%), Yellow-crowned Euphonia (about 20%) and Elegant Euphonia (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Thick-billed Euphonia sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Thick-billed Euphonia is recorded against all the birds logged in Chirripó National Park (206 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.