What are the chances of seeing a Common Redshank in Chitwan National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Common Redshank sighting in Chitwan National Park on a given day, based on 39 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 219th most-seen of the 367 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Common Redshank in Chitwan National Park?
March
In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Common Redshank in Chitwan National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April to February, the lowest months. That is one of Chitwan National Park's driest months, with about 40 mm of rain against 660 mm in July.
What time of day is best to see a Common Redshank?
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Common Redshank sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Chitwan National Park the best place to see a Common Redshank?
22nd of 30
Of the 30 parks where we can rate Common Redshank sightings, Chitwan National Park ranks 22nd at under 5%. The best odds are in Sundarbans National Park (India, about 60%), Wadden Sea National Park (Germany, about 50%) and Yala National Park (Sri Lanka, about 40%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Common Redshank live in Chitwan National Park?
Same genus: Tringa
The closest relatives of the Common Redshank that you can see in Chitwan National Park (genus Tringa, Shanks, Tattlers, and Allies) are Green Sandpiper (about 30%) and Common Greenshank (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Common Redshank sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Common Redshank is recorded against all the birds logged in Chitwan National Park (39 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.