What are the chances of seeing a Black Tern in Coiba National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Black Tern sighting in Coiba National Park on a given day, based on 28 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 64th most-seen of the 118 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Black Tern in Coiba National Park?
July
In that month about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Black Tern in Coiba National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February and December, the lowest months. That is one of Coiba National Park's wettest months, with about 490 mm of rain against 35 mm in February. May and October have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Black Tern?
Between 11 am and 2 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Black Tern sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Coiba National Park the best place to see a Black Tern?
9th of 36
Of the 36 parks where we can rate Black Tern sightings, Coiba National Park ranks 9th at about 10%. The best odds are in Padre Island National Seashore (United States, about 30%), Biebrza National Park (Poland, about 20%) and Elk Island National Park (Canada, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Black Tern live in Coiba National Park?
Same family: Laridae
The closest relatives of the Black Tern that you can see in Coiba National Park (family Laridae, Gulls, Terns, and Skimmers) are Royal Tern (about 20%), Laughing Gull (about 10%) and Brown Noddy (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Black Tern sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Black Tern is recorded against all the birds logged in Coiba National Park (28 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.