What are the chances of seeing a Black-throated Mango in Iguaçu National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Black-throated Mango sighting in Iguaçu National Park on a given day, based on 98 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 202nd most-seen of the 346 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Black-throated Mango in Iguaçu National Park?
January
In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Black-throated Mango in Iguaçu National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February to December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Black-throated Mango?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Black-throated Mango sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Iguaçu National Park the best place to see a Black-throated Mango?
20th of 27
Of the 27 parks where we can rate Black-throated Mango sightings, Iguaçu National Park ranks 20th at under 5%. The best odds are in Main Ridge Forest Reserve (Trinidad and Tobago, about 30%), Chapada dos Guimarães National Park (Brazil, about 20%) and Soberanía National Park (Panama, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Black-throated Mango live in Iguaçu National Park?
Same family: Trochilidae
The closest relatives of the Black-throated Mango that you can see in Iguaçu National Park (family Trochilidae, Hummingbirds) are Violet-capped Woodnymph (about 20%), Scale-throated Hermit (about 10%) and Versicolored Emerald (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Black-throated Mango sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Black-throated Mango is recorded against all the birds logged in Iguaçu National Park (98 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.