What are the chances of seeing a Pied Kingfisher in Satpura National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Pied Kingfisher sighting in Satpura National Park on a given day, based on 154 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 82nd most-seen of the 259 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Pied Kingfisher in Satpura National Park?
December
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Pied Kingfisher in Satpura National Park on a given day, against under 5% in June and August, the lowest months. That is one of Satpura National Park's driest months, with about 10 mm of rain against 690 mm in July.
What time of day is best to see a Pied Kingfisher?
Between 3 and 6 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Pied Kingfisher sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Satpura National Park the best place to see a Pied Kingfisher?
37th of 67
Of the 67 parks where we can rate Pied Kingfisher sightings, Satpura National Park ranks 37th at about 20%. The best odds are in Liwonde National Park (Malawi, about 70%), Niokolo-Koba National Park (Senegal, about 70%) and Gonarezhou National Park (Zimbabwe, about 60%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Pied Kingfisher live in Satpura National Park?
Same family: Alcedinidae
The closest relatives of the Pied Kingfisher that you can see in Satpura National Park (family Alcedinidae, Kingfishers) are White-throated Kingfisher (about 60%), Common Kingfisher (about 30%) and Stork-billed Kingfisher (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Pied Kingfisher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Pied Kingfisher is recorded against all the birds logged in Satpura National Park (154 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.