What are the chances of seeing a Vermilion Flycatcher in Yasuní National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Vermilion Flycatcher sighting in Yasuní National Park on a given day, based on 8 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 512th most-seen of the 533 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Vermilion Flycatcher in Yasuní National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Vermilion Flycatcher in Yasuní National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Vermilion Flycatcher?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Vermilion Flycatcher sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Yasuní National Park the best place to see a Vermilion Flycatcher?
33rd of 36
Of the 36 parks where we can rate Vermilion Flycatcher sightings, Yasuní National Park ranks 33rd at under 5%. The best odds are in Parque Estadual Encontro das Águas (Brazil, about 40%), Big Bend National Park (United States, about 40%) and Bahía de Loreto National Park (Mexico, about 30%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Vermilion Flycatcher live in Yasuní National Park?
Same family: Tyrannidae
The closest relatives of the Vermilion Flycatcher that you can see in Yasuní National Park (family Tyrannidae, Tyrant Flycatchers) are Tropical Kingbird (about 50%), Great Kiskadee (about 50%) and Lesser Kiskadee (about 40%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Vermilion Flycatcher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Vermilion Flycatcher is recorded against all the birds logged in Yasuní National Park (8 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.