What are the chances of seeing a Collared Trogon in Amacayacu National Natural Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Collared Trogon sighting in Amacayacu National Natural Park on a given day, based on 70 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 148th most-seen of the 436 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Collared Trogon in Amacayacu National Natural Park?
February
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Collared Trogon in Amacayacu National Natural Park on a given day, against under 5% in June, the lowest month.
What time of day is best to see a Collared Trogon?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Collared Trogon sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Amacayacu National Natural Park the best place to see a Collared Trogon?
16th of 39
Of the 39 parks where we can rate Collared Trogon sightings, Amacayacu National Natural Park ranks 16th at about 10%. The best odds are in El Triunfo (Mexico, about 40%), Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve (Costa Rica, about 30%) and Main Ridge Forest Reserve (Trinidad and Tobago, about 30%).
Which relatives of the Collared Trogon live in Amacayacu National Natural Park?
Same genus: Trogon
The closest relatives of the Collared Trogon that you can see in Amacayacu National Natural Park (genus Trogon, New World Trogons) are Green-backed Trogon (about 30%), Black-tailed Trogon (about 20%) and Blue-crowned Trogon (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Collared Trogon sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Collared Trogon is recorded against all the birds logged in Amacayacu National Natural Park (70 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.