What are the chances of seeing a Gray-rumped Swift in Amboró National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Gray-rumped Swift sighting in Amboró National Park on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 255th most-seen of the 273 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Gray-rumped Swift in Amboró National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Gray-rumped Swift in Amboró National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season. June has too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Gray-rumped Swift?
Between 3 and 6 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Gray-rumped Swift sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Amboró National Park the best place to see a Gray-rumped Swift?
27th of 32
Of the 32 parks where we can rate Gray-rumped Swift sightings, Amboró National Park ranks 27th at under 5%. The best odds are in Serra dos Órgãos National Park (Brazil, about 50%), Main Ridge Forest Reserve (Trinidad and Tobago, about 20%) and Tortuguero National Park (Costa Rica, about 20%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Gray-rumped Swift live in Amboró National Park?
Same family: Apodidae
The closest relatives of the Gray-rumped Swift that you can see in Amboró National Park (family Apodidae, Swifts) are White-collared Swift (about 30%), White-tipped Swift (about 20%) and Andean Swift (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Gray-rumped Swift sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Gray-rumped Swift is recorded against all the birds logged in Amboró National Park (5 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.