What are the chances of seeing an Abracris flavolineata in Cahuita National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report an Abracris flavolineata sighting in Cahuita National Park on a given day, based on 15 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 7th most-seen of the 51 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Abracris flavolineata in Cahuita National Park?
January, April, July–August and November
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report an Abracris flavolineata in Cahuita National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February, June and September–October, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see an Abracris flavolineata?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Abracris flavolineata sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Cahuita National Park the best place to see an Abracris flavolineata?
28th of 40
Of the 40 parks where we can rate Abracris flavolineata sightings, Cahuita National Park ranks 28th at about 10%. The best odds are in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve (Ecuador, about 40%), Brownsberg Nature Park (Suriname, about 40%) and Iguazú National Park (Argentina, about 30%).
Which relatives of the Abracris flavolineata live in Cahuita National Park?
Same order: Orthoptera
The closest relatives of the Abracris flavolineata that you can see in Cahuita National Park (order Orthoptera, Grasshoppers, Crickets, and Katydids) are Ischnomela pulchripennis (about 20%) and Rhinoceros Katydid (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Abracris flavolineata sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Abracris flavolineata is recorded against all the insects logged in Cahuita National Park (15 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.