What are the chances of seeing a Crane Hawk in Calakmul Biosphere Reserve?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Crane Hawk sighting in Calakmul Biosphere Reserve on a given day, based on 22 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 220th most-seen of the 271 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Crane Hawk in Calakmul Biosphere Reserve?
January and February
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Crane Hawk in Calakmul Biosphere Reserve on a given day, against under 5% in March to December, the lowest months. Those are among Calakmul Biosphere Reserve's driest months, with about 25 mm of rain a month against 130 mm in June.
What time of day is best to see a Crane Hawk?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Crane Hawk sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Calakmul Biosphere Reserve the best place to see a Crane Hawk?
17th of 38
Of the 38 parks where we can rate Crane Hawk sightings, Calakmul Biosphere Reserve ranks 17th at under 5%. The best odds are in Parque Estadual Encontro das Águas (Brazil, about 30%), El Palmar National Park (Argentina, about 20%) and El Impenetrable National Park (Argentina, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Crane Hawk live in Calakmul Biosphere Reserve?
Same family: Accipitridae
The closest relatives of the Crane Hawk that you can see in Calakmul Biosphere Reserve (family Accipitridae, Hawks, Eagles, and Kites) are Roadside Hawk (about 50%), Ornate Hawk-Eagle (about 10%) and Gray-lined Hawk (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Crane Hawk sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Crane Hawk is recorded against all the birds logged in Calakmul Biosphere Reserve (22 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.