What are the chances of seeing a Yellow-bellied Sapsucker in Ciénaga de Zapata?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Yellow-bellied Sapsucker sighting in Ciénaga de Zapata on a given day, based on 172 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 97th most-seen of the 177 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Yellow-bellied Sapsucker in Ciénaga de Zapata?
October and December
In those months about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Yellow-bellied Sapsucker in Ciénaga de Zapata on a given day, against under 5% in April–May and July–August, the lowest months. September has too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Yellow-bellied Sapsucker?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Yellow-bellied Sapsucker sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Ciénaga de Zapata the best place to see a Yellow-bellied Sapsucker?
5th of 44
Of the 44 parks where we can rate Yellow-bellied Sapsucker sightings, Ciénaga de Zapata ranks 5th at about 10%. The best odds are in Riding Mountain National Park (Canada, about 40%), Congaree National Park (United States, about 30%) and Elk Island National Park (Canada, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Yellow-bellied Sapsucker live in Ciénaga de Zapata?
Same family: Picidae
The closest relatives of the Yellow-bellied Sapsucker that you can see in Ciénaga de Zapata (family Picidae, Woodpeckers) are West Indian Woodpecker (about 40%), Cuban Green Woodpecker (about 30%) and Northern Flicker (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Yellow-bellied Sapsucker sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Yellow-bellied Sapsucker is recorded against all the birds logged in Ciénaga de Zapata (172 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.