What are the chances of seeing a Crane Hawk in Emas National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Crane Hawk sighting in Emas National Park on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 171st most-seen of the 187 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Crane Hawk in Emas National Park?
July and August
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Crane Hawk in Emas National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March, May–June and September–November, the lowest months. Those are among Emas National Park's driest months, with about 10 mm of rain a month against 190 mm in January. April and December–February have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Crane Hawk?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Crane Hawk sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Emas National Park the best place to see a Crane Hawk?
14th of 38
Of the 38 parks where we can rate Crane Hawk sightings, Emas National Park ranks 14th at under 5%. The best odds are in Parque Estadual Encontro das Águas (Brazil, about 30%), El Palmar National Park (Argentina, about 20%) and El Impenetrable National Park (Argentina, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Crane Hawk live in Emas National Park?
Same family: Accipitridae
The closest relatives of the Crane Hawk that you can see in Emas National Park (family Accipitridae, Hawks, Eagles, and Kites) are White-tailed Hawk (about 60%), Savanna Hawk (about 60%) and Roadside Hawk (about 40%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Crane Hawk sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Crane Hawk is recorded against all the birds logged in Emas National Park (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.