What are the chances of seeing a Thick-billed Euphonia in Henri Pittier National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Thick-billed Euphonia sighting in Henri Pittier National Park on a given day, based on 36 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 167th most-seen of the 358 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Thick-billed Euphonia in Henri Pittier National Park?
April
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Thick-billed Euphonia in Henri Pittier National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February–March, May and July–November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Thick-billed Euphonia?
Between 6 and 9 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Thick-billed Euphonia sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Henri Pittier National Park the best place to see a Thick-billed Euphonia?
19th of 28
Of the 28 parks where we can rate Thick-billed Euphonia sightings, Henri Pittier National Park ranks 19th at about 10%. The best odds are in Chagres National Park (Panama, about 60%), Machalilla National Park (Ecuador, about 30%) and Tayrona National Natural Park (Colombia, about 30%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Thick-billed Euphonia live in Henri Pittier National Park?
Same genus: Euphonia
The closest relatives of the Thick-billed Euphonia that you can see in Henri Pittier National Park (genus Euphonia, Typical Euphonias) are Orange-bellied Euphonia (about 30%) and Trinidad Euphonia (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Thick-billed Euphonia sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Thick-billed Euphonia is recorded against all the birds logged in Henri Pittier National Park (36 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.