What are the chances of seeing a Crane Hawk in Ostional Wildlife Refuge?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Crane Hawk sighting in Ostional Wildlife Refuge on a given day, based on 15 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 134th most-seen of the 182 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Crane Hawk in Ostional Wildlife Refuge?
December and January
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Crane Hawk in Ostional Wildlife Refuge on a given day, against under 5% in February to November, the lowest months. Those are among Ostional Wildlife Refuge's driest months, with about 65 mm of rain a month against 560 mm in October.
What time of day is best to see a Crane Hawk?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Crane Hawk sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Ostional Wildlife Refuge the best place to see a Crane Hawk?
16th of 38
Of the 38 parks where we can rate Crane Hawk sightings, Ostional Wildlife Refuge ranks 16th at under 5%. The best odds are in Parque Estadual Encontro das Águas (Brazil, about 30%), El Palmar National Park (Argentina, about 20%) and El Impenetrable National Park (Argentina, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Crane Hawk live in Ostional Wildlife Refuge?
Same family: Accipitridae
The closest relatives of the Crane Hawk that you can see in Ostional Wildlife Refuge (family Accipitridae, Hawks, Eagles, and Kites) are Common Black-Hawk (about 40%), Broad-winged Hawk (about 10%) and Roadside Hawk (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Crane Hawk sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Crane Hawk is recorded against all the birds logged in Ostional Wildlife Refuge (15 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.