What are the chances of seeing a Thick-billed Euphonia in Tambopata National Reserve?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Thick-billed Euphonia sighting in Tambopata National Reserve on a given day, based on 27 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 438th most-seen of the 550 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Thick-billed Euphonia in Tambopata National Reserve?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Thick-billed Euphonia in Tambopata National Reserve on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Thick-billed Euphonia?
Between 6 and 9 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Thick-billed Euphonia sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Tambopata National Reserve the best place to see a Thick-billed Euphonia?
26th of 28
Of the 28 parks where we can rate Thick-billed Euphonia sightings, Tambopata National Reserve ranks 26th at under 5%. The best odds are in Chagres National Park (Panama, about 60%), Machalilla National Park (Ecuador, about 30%) and Tayrona National Natural Park (Colombia, about 30%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Thick-billed Euphonia live in Tambopata National Reserve?
Same genus: Euphonia
The closest relatives of the Thick-billed Euphonia that you can see in Tambopata National Reserve (genus Euphonia, Typical Euphonias) are Golden-bellied Euphonia (about 10%) and Rufous-bellied Euphonia (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Thick-billed Euphonia sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Thick-billed Euphonia is recorded against all the birds logged in Tambopata National Reserve (27 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.