What are the chances of seeing a White Peacock in Bahía de Loreto National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a White Peacock sighting in Bahía de Loreto National Park on a given day, based on 9 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 35th most-seen of the 57 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a White Peacock in Bahía de Loreto National Park?
November
In that month about 40% of wildlife watchers report a White Peacock in Bahía de Loreto National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January to September, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a White Peacock?
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most White Peacock sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Bahía de Loreto National Park the best place to see a White Peacock?
45th of 52
Of the 52 parks where we can rate White Peacock sightings, Bahía de Loreto National Park ranks 45th at about 10%. The best odds are in Los Haitises National Park (Dominican Republic, about 50%), Big Cypress National Preserve (United States, about 40%) and Everglades National Park (United States, about 40%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the White Peacock live in Bahía de Loreto National Park?
Same family: Nymphalidae
The closest relatives of the White Peacock that you can see in Bahía de Loreto National Park (family Nymphalidae, Brush-footed Butterflies) are Gulf Fritillary (about 30%), Texan Crescent (about 30%) and Queen (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the White Peacock sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the White Peacock is recorded against all the insects logged in Bahía de Loreto National Park (9 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.