What are the chances of seeing a Lesser Yellowlegs in Ciénaga de Zapata?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Lesser Yellowlegs sighting in Ciénaga de Zapata on a given day, based on 252 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 83rd most-seen of the 177 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Lesser Yellowlegs in Ciénaga de Zapata?
January and February
In those months about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Lesser Yellowlegs in Ciénaga de Zapata on a given day, against under 5% in October, the lowest month. Those are among Ciénaga de Zapata's driest months, with about 20 mm of rain a month against 150 mm in June. September has too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Lesser Yellowlegs?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Lesser Yellowlegs sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Ciénaga de Zapata the best place to see a Lesser Yellowlegs?
5th of 55
Of the 55 parks where we can rate Lesser Yellowlegs sightings, Ciénaga de Zapata ranks 5th at about 20%. The best odds are in Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge (United States, about 30%), Wood Buffalo National Park (Canada, about 30%) and Celestún Biosphere Reserve (Mexico, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Lesser Yellowlegs live in Ciénaga de Zapata?
Same genus: Tringa
The closest relatives of the Lesser Yellowlegs that you can see in Ciénaga de Zapata (genus Tringa, Shanks, Tattlers, and Allies) are Greater Yellowlegs (about 30%) and Willet (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Lesser Yellowlegs sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Lesser Yellowlegs is recorded against all the birds logged in Ciénaga de Zapata (252 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.