What are the chances of seeing a Crane Hawk in Marino Ballena National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Crane Hawk sighting in Marino Ballena National Park on a given day, based on 43 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 180th most-seen of the 303 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Crane Hawk in Marino Ballena National Park?
February and October–November
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Crane Hawk in Marino Ballena National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March–September and December–January, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Crane Hawk?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Crane Hawk sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Marino Ballena National Park the best place to see a Crane Hawk?
18th of 38
Of the 38 parks where we can rate Crane Hawk sightings, Marino Ballena National Park ranks 18th at under 5%. The best odds are in Parque Estadual Encontro das Águas (Brazil, about 30%), El Palmar National Park (Argentina, about 20%) and El Impenetrable National Park (Argentina, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Crane Hawk live in Marino Ballena National Park?
Same family: Accipitridae
The closest relatives of the Crane Hawk that you can see in Marino Ballena National Park (family Accipitridae, Hawks, Eagles, and Kites) are Roadside Hawk (about 40%), Common Black-Hawk (about 30%) and Double-toothed Kite (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Crane Hawk sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Crane Hawk is recorded against all the birds logged in Marino Ballena National Park (43 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.