What are the chances of seeing a Gray-headed Kite in Marino Ballena National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Gray-headed Kite sighting in Marino Ballena National Park on a given day, based on 73 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 139th most-seen of the 303 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Gray-headed Kite in Marino Ballena National Park?
January, May–June and September–October
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Gray-headed Kite in Marino Ballena National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February–April, July–August and November–December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Gray-headed Kite?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Gray-headed Kite sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Marino Ballena National Park the best place to see a Gray-headed Kite?
10th of 40
Of the 40 parks where we can rate Gray-headed Kite sightings, Marino Ballena National Park ranks 10th at under 5%. The best odds are in Brownsberg Nature Park (Suriname, about 10%), Soberanía National Park (Panama, about 10%) and Anavilhanas National Park (Brazil, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Gray-headed Kite live in Marino Ballena National Park?
Same family: Accipitridae
The closest relatives of the Gray-headed Kite that you can see in Marino Ballena National Park (family Accipitridae, Hawks, Eagles, and Kites) are Roadside Hawk (about 40%), Common Black-Hawk (about 30%) and Double-toothed Kite (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Gray-headed Kite sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Gray-headed Kite is recorded against all the birds logged in Marino Ballena National Park (73 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.