What are the chances of seeing a Booted Eagle in Royal Bardia National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Booted Eagle sighting in Royal Bardia National Park on a given day, based on 7 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 210th most-seen of the 233 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Booted Eagle in Royal Bardia National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Booted Eagle in Royal Bardia National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season. August has too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Booted Eagle?
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Booted Eagle sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Royal Bardia National Park the best place to see a Booted Eagle?
30th of 55
Of the 55 parks where we can rate Booted Eagle sightings, Royal Bardia National Park ranks 30th at under 5%. The best odds are in Monfragüe National Park (Spain, about 30%), Sierra Nevada National Park (Spain, about 30%) and Sierra de Guadarrama National Park (Spain, about 30%).
Which relatives of the Booted Eagle live in Royal Bardia National Park?
Same family: Accipitridae
The closest relatives of the Booted Eagle that you can see in Royal Bardia National Park (family Accipitridae, Hawks, Eagles, and Kites) are Crested Serpent Eagle (about 50%), Crested Hawk-Eagle (about 40%) and Oriental Honey-buzzard (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Booted Eagle sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Booted Eagle is recorded against all the birds logged in Royal Bardia National Park (7 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.