What are the chances of seeing a Crane Hawk in Serra da Canastra National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Crane Hawk sighting in Serra da Canastra National Park on a given day, based on 7 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 269th most-seen of the 294 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Crane Hawk in Serra da Canastra National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Crane Hawk in Serra da Canastra National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Crane Hawk?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Crane Hawk sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Serra da Canastra National Park the best place to see a Crane Hawk?
24th of 38
Of the 38 parks where we can rate Crane Hawk sightings, Serra da Canastra National Park ranks 24th at under 5%. The best odds are in Parque Estadual Encontro das Águas (Brazil, about 30%), El Palmar National Park (Argentina, about 20%) and El Impenetrable National Park (Argentina, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Crane Hawk live in Serra da Canastra National Park?
Same family: Accipitridae
The closest relatives of the Crane Hawk that you can see in Serra da Canastra National Park (family Accipitridae, Hawks, Eagles, and Kites) are White-tailed Hawk (about 30%), Roadside Hawk (about 30%) and Black-chested Buzzard-Eagle (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Crane Hawk sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Crane Hawk is recorded against all the birds logged in Serra da Canastra National Park (7 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.