What are the chances of seeing a Gull-billed Tern in Cabo Blanco Absolute Nature Reserve?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Gull-billed Tern sighting in Cabo Blanco Absolute Nature Reserve on a given day, based on 9 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 232nd most-seen of the 241 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Gull-billed Tern in Cabo Blanco Absolute Nature Reserve?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Gull-billed Tern in Cabo Blanco Absolute Nature Reserve on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Gull-billed Tern?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Gull-billed Tern sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Cabo Blanco Absolute Nature Reserve the best place to see a Gull-billed Tern?
33rd of 45
Of the 45 parks where we can rate Gull-billed Tern sightings, Cabo Blanco Absolute Nature Reserve ranks 33rd at under 5%. The best odds are in Lake Nakuru National Park (Kenya, about 40%), Ngorongoro Conservation Area (Tanzania, about 30%) and Yala National Park (Sri Lanka, about 30%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Gull-billed Tern live in Cabo Blanco Absolute Nature Reserve?
Same family: Laridae
The closest relatives of the Gull-billed Tern that you can see in Cabo Blanco Absolute Nature Reserve (family Laridae, Gulls, Terns, and Skimmers) are Royal Tern (about 30%), Laughing Gull (about 10%) and Black Tern (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Gull-billed Tern sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Gull-billed Tern is recorded against all the birds logged in Cabo Blanco Absolute Nature Reserve (9 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.