What are the chances of seeing a Black Phoebe in Chirripó National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Black Phoebe sighting in Chirripó National Park on a given day, based on 84 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 157th most-seen of the 332 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Black Phoebe in Chirripó National Park?
April, June–July and September–November
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Black Phoebe in Chirripó National Park on a given day, against under 5% in May, August and December–March, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Black Phoebe?
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Black Phoebe sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Chirripó National Park the best place to see a Black Phoebe?
34th of 45
Of the 45 parks where we can rate Black Phoebe sightings, Chirripó National Park ranks 34th at about 10%. The best odds are in Channel Islands National Park (United States, about 70%), Amboró National Park (Bolivia, about 60%) and Death Valley National Park (United States, about 40%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Black Phoebe live in Chirripó National Park?
Same family: Tyrannidae
The closest relatives of the Black Phoebe that you can see in Chirripó National Park (family Tyrannidae, Tyrant Flycatchers) are Great Kiskadee (about 40%), Guatemalan Paltry Tyrannulet (about 40%) and Tropical Kingbird (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Black Phoebe sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Black Phoebe is recorded against all the birds logged in Chirripó National Park (84 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.