What are the chances of seeing a Black Phoebe in Cusuco National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Black Phoebe sighting in Cusuco National Park on a given day, based on 39 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 138th most-seen of the 250 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Black Phoebe in Cusuco National Park?
March
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Black Phoebe in Cusuco National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April, June–July and October–January, the lowest months. That is one of Cusuco National Park's driest months, with about 100 mm of rain against 420 mm in November.
What time of day is best to see a Black Phoebe?
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Black Phoebe sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Cusuco National Park the best place to see a Black Phoebe?
31st of 45
Of the 45 parks where we can rate Black Phoebe sightings, Cusuco National Park ranks 31st at about 10%. The best odds are in Channel Islands National Park (United States, about 70%), Amboró National Park (Bolivia, about 60%) and Death Valley National Park (United States, about 40%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Black Phoebe live in Cusuco National Park?
Same family: Tyrannidae
The closest relatives of the Black Phoebe that you can see in Cusuco National Park (family Tyrannidae, Tyrant Flycatchers) are Great Kiskadee (about 50%), Social Flycatcher (about 50%) and Yellow-olive Flycatcher (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Black Phoebe sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Black Phoebe is recorded against all the birds logged in Cusuco National Park (39 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.