What are the chances of seeing a Melodious Blackbird in Cusuco National Park?
Likely
About 60% of wildlife watchers report a Melodious Blackbird sighting in Cusuco National Park on a given day, based on 433 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 5th most-seen of the 250 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 90%, and over a week to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Melodious Blackbird in Cusuco National Park?
May and November
In those months about 90% of wildlife watchers report a Melodious Blackbird in Cusuco National Park on a given day, against about 40% in June, the lowest month.
What time of day is best to see a Melodious Blackbird?
Between 6 and 9 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Melodious Blackbird sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Cusuco National Park the best place to see a Melodious Blackbird?
6th of 44
Of the 44 parks where we can rate Melodious Blackbird sightings, Cusuco National Park ranks 6th at about 60%. The best odds are in Masaya Volcano National Park (Nicaragua, about 80%), Lago de Yojoa (Honduras, about 70%) and Tikal National Park (Guatemala, about 70%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Melodious Blackbird live in Cusuco National Park?
Same family: Icteridae
The closest relatives of the Melodious Blackbird that you can see in Cusuco National Park (family Icteridae, New World Blackbirds and Orioles) are Montezuma Oropendola (about 50%), Great-tailed Grackle (about 40%) and Chestnut-headed Oropendola (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Melodious Blackbird sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Melodious Blackbird is recorded against all the birds logged in Cusuco National Park (433 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.