What are the chances of seeing a Sharp-shinned Hawk in Cusuco National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Sharp-shinned Hawk sighting in Cusuco National Park on a given day, based on 19 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 175th most-seen of the 250 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Sharp-shinned Hawk in Cusuco National Park?
March–April, June and October
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Sharp-shinned Hawk in Cusuco National Park on a given day, against under 5% in May, July–September and November–February, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Sharp-shinned Hawk?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Sharp-shinned Hawk sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Cusuco National Park the best place to see a Sharp-shinned Hawk?
26th of 70
Of the 70 parks where we can rate Sharp-shinned Hawk sightings, Cusuco National Park ranks 26th at under 5%. The best odds are in Point Pelee National Park (Canada, about 10%), Celaque National Park (Honduras, about 10%) and El Triunfo (Mexico, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Sharp-shinned Hawk live in Cusuco National Park?
Same family: Accipitridae
The closest relatives of the Sharp-shinned Hawk that you can see in Cusuco National Park (family Accipitridae, Hawks, Eagles, and Kites) are Gray-lined Hawk (about 20%), American Swallow-tailed Kite (about 10%) and Short-tailed Hawk (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Sharp-shinned Hawk sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Sharp-shinned Hawk is recorded against all the birds logged in Cusuco National Park (19 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.