What are the chances of seeing a Sharp-shinned Hawk in Grand Teton National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Sharp-shinned Hawk sighting in Grand Teton National Park on a given day, based on 150 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 102nd most-seen of the 185 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Sharp-shinned Hawk in Grand Teton National Park?
April–May and August
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Sharp-shinned Hawk in Grand Teton National Park on a given day, against under 5% in June–July and September–March, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Sharp-shinned Hawk?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Sharp-shinned Hawk sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Grand Teton National Park the best place to see a Sharp-shinned Hawk?
14th of 70
Of the 70 parks where we can rate Sharp-shinned Hawk sightings, Grand Teton National Park ranks 14th at under 5%. The best odds are in Point Pelee National Park (Canada, about 10%), Celaque National Park (Honduras, about 10%) and El Triunfo (Mexico, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Sharp-shinned Hawk live in Grand Teton National Park?
Same family: Accipitridae
The closest relatives of the Sharp-shinned Hawk that you can see in Grand Teton National Park (family Accipitridae, Hawks, Eagles, and Kites) are Bald Eagle (about 30%), Red-tailed Hawk (about 30%) and Hen Harrier (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Sharp-shinned Hawk sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Sharp-shinned Hawk is recorded against all the birds logged in Grand Teton National Park (150 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.