What are the chances of seeing a Golden-winged Warbler in La Tigra National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Golden-winged Warbler sighting in La Tigra National Park on a given day, based on 48 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 57th most-seen of the 176 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Golden-winged Warbler in La Tigra National Park?
February and October
In those months about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Golden-winged Warbler in La Tigra National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January, March and May–June, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Golden-winged Warbler?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Golden-winged Warbler sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is La Tigra National Park the best place to see a Golden-winged Warbler?
3rd of 39
Of the 39 parks where we can rate Golden-winged Warbler sightings, La Tigra National Park ranks 3rd at about 10%. The best odds are in Chagres National Park (Panama, about 20%) and Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve (Costa Rica, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Golden-winged Warbler live in La Tigra National Park?
Same family: Parulidae
The closest relatives of the Golden-winged Warbler that you can see in La Tigra National Park (family Parulidae, New World Warblers) are Slate-throated Redstart (about 50%), Wilson's Warbler (about 50%) and Crescent-chested Warbler (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Golden-winged Warbler sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Golden-winged Warbler is recorded against all the birds logged in La Tigra National Park (48 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.