What are the chances of seeing a Black Phoebe in Sierra de la Macarena National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Black Phoebe sighting in Sierra de la Macarena National Park on a given day, based on 81 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 147th most-seen of the 418 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Black Phoebe in Sierra de la Macarena National Park?
August
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Black Phoebe in Sierra de la Macarena National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January, March–April, June, September and November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Black Phoebe?
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Black Phoebe sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Sierra de la Macarena National Park the best place to see a Black Phoebe?
29th of 45
Of the 45 parks where we can rate Black Phoebe sightings, Sierra de la Macarena National Park ranks 29th at about 10%. The best odds are in Channel Islands National Park (United States, about 70%), Amboró National Park (Bolivia, about 60%) and Death Valley National Park (United States, about 40%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Black Phoebe live in Sierra de la Macarena National Park?
Same family: Tyrannidae
The closest relatives of the Black Phoebe that you can see in Sierra de la Macarena National Park (family Tyrannidae, Tyrant Flycatchers) are Tropical Kingbird (about 60%), Great Kiskadee (about 30%) and Rusty-margined Flycatcher (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Black Phoebe sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Black Phoebe is recorded against all the birds logged in Sierra de la Macarena National Park (81 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.