What are the chances of seeing a Common Buzzard in Vanoise National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Common Buzzard sighting in Vanoise National Park on a given day, based on 36 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 49th most-seen of the 81 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Common Buzzard in Vanoise National Park?
October
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Common Buzzard in Vanoise National Park on a given day, against under 5% in December and January, the lowest months. November has too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Common Buzzard?
Between noon and 3 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Common Buzzard sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Vanoise National Park the best place to see a Common Buzzard?
29th of 76
Of the 76 parks where we can rate Common Buzzard sightings, Vanoise National Park ranks 29th at about 10%. The best odds are in Kiskunság National Park (Hungary, about 70%), Hortobágy National Park (Hungary, about 50%) and Fertő-Hanság National Park (Hungary, about 50%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Common Buzzard live in Vanoise National Park?
Same family: Accipitridae
The closest relatives of the Common Buzzard that you can see in Vanoise National Park (family Accipitridae, Hawks, Eagles, and Kites) are Golden Eagle (about 30%), Bearded Vulture (about 30%) and Griffon Vulture (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Common Buzzard sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Common Buzzard is recorded against all the birds logged in Vanoise National Park (36 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.