What are the chances of seeing a Sharp-shinned Hawk in Big Cypress National Preserve?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Sharp-shinned Hawk sighting in Big Cypress National Preserve on a given day, based on 26 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 142nd most-seen of the 199 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Sharp-shinned Hawk in Big Cypress National Preserve?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Sharp-shinned Hawk in Big Cypress National Preserve on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Sharp-shinned Hawk?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Sharp-shinned Hawk sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Big Cypress National Preserve the best place to see a Sharp-shinned Hawk?
56th of 70
Of the 70 parks where we can rate Sharp-shinned Hawk sightings, Big Cypress National Preserve ranks 56th at under 5%. The best odds are in Point Pelee National Park (Canada, about 10%), Celaque National Park (Honduras, about 10%) and El Triunfo (Mexico, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Sharp-shinned Hawk live in Big Cypress National Preserve?
Same family: Accipitridae
The closest relatives of the Sharp-shinned Hawk that you can see in Big Cypress National Preserve (family Accipitridae, Hawks, Eagles, and Kites) are Red-shouldered Hawk (about 70%), American Swallow-tailed Kite (about 20%) and Short-tailed Hawk (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Sharp-shinned Hawk sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Sharp-shinned Hawk is recorded against all the birds logged in Big Cypress National Preserve (26 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.